Sony Loses Class Action Lawsuit in Waterproof Claims for Original Xperia Z Line


Reading Time:  5 Minutes

Arguably, one of the pioneers in the consumer sector for more “rugged” devices (or at the very least IP certification) has to be . Back in 2012, they introduced the Xperia Z line of the devices, which marked a turning point for in most of its philosophy as well as its design language.

They completely overhauled the look and feel of the devices they had in favor of the glass slab that they offer even in today’s phones and tablets. Despite its fragile appearance, most of their offerings were drop-tested and were able to withstand a substantial amount of mistreatment. On top of all that, the was the first commercially available phone from to me, marketed as “water resistant” with an IP56 rating for water and dust ingress (which isn’t really much, but at least it would keep your phone going in spite of an accidental drop in the beach or in the pool). However, the phone was advertised in such a way that it it looked as if the device was waterproof and not water resistant (there is a big difference). This led to a lot of water-damaged devices, which did nothing about and eventually, a was filed (and won) against .

People used to do all sorts of crazy things with the phones. Everything from dropping them on concrete, to dunking them on glasses of water, wine, beer, hot chocolate, and there is even a video in Youtube of someone cooking the device in soup (because why not, right?) Then, you had the more “sane” ones (like yours truly) who would simply use the device, at most to take pictures in a pool (at around 2 inches in depth) to test how the camera would perform under water. There were some precautions that needed to be taken before the water activities took place, like for instance making sure all the access ports were securely closed to prevent . Personally, I always did it with my phone. However, one day, my Xperia Z simply stopped working.

I decided to have a close look at the ports (which had multiple water detecting strips) to see if maybe I had forgotten to close the lids as per manufacturer instructions. The water indicators were white as snow, which means that either the device was failing for a different reason or water had gone in through a different place. Upon closer inspection of the device, I noticed that the back glass panel of the phone was raised and could actually be pressed back into place only for it to pop up again. The area was right around where the processor was placed (a Snapdragon S4 Pro) and it was no surprise as there were reported overheating issues with the device.

Upon closer inspection, I found that the glass on the back was warped, likely because of the heat coming from the chipset, which also likely loosened the glue thus compromising seals in place to prevent water from getting in. With all this information (as well as a myriad of complains about similar issues in our forum as well as ’s official forum), I decided to send my device over to for a warranty repair. About 2 weeks later, I received an e-mail update from stating that my device was on its way back to me and that I was correct in my assumption as the technicians had found rust caused by water shorting some components inside the device. However, because it was me who used the device under water, they said the damage was my fault and was not covered under the warranty (despite the device supposedly being able to withstand light water immersion). In case you are wondering, they also included the pictures of the water indicators being white in the report, which means that it was not really going in through a user-accessible area (in other words, water did not go in because I did not follow directions). Since my phone had turned into a glass covered paper weight, I decided to sell it on eBay for spares (as the screen and everything else was immaculate.)

Fast forward a few years, as it turns out most other people who suffered a similar fate did not sit idly and decided to file a Class Action lawsuit against . According to the settlement, there were 24 models affected (ironically, the original Z is not listed as being one of them) starting from the ZR, which was a close cousin of the original Z and going all the way to the Xperia Z5, along with a few tablets as well. The settlement goes on to state that there are a few things that, if you were affected, you can opt for:

  • extension for up to a year if the device is within warranty period;
  • extension for up to 6 months if the device is no longer under warranty;
  • Up to 50% of MSRP as refund for compensation if the device is listed among the ones on the lawsuit;

If you are going for the cash alternative, you do have a deadline to meet, which is January 30, 2018. Whichever course of action you do decide to take, please make sure that you understand the entire lawsuit document before doing anything!

Did you get affected by this or any other similar marketing claims? Please share your experiences in the comments below!

Source: Landes v. Mobile Communications site
Via: PhoneArena